Darren Henley’s article in the Guardian on the 17th February, “The ENO must evolve for its own sake”, is disingenuous and highlights the problem with the Arts Council and arts funding; a lack of an art form policy that holds the organisation to account for its funding decisions. Before the last funding round in 2015 the Arts Council conducted a comprehensive review of ENO resulting in a £5 million cut in its funding from £17 million to £12 million, but ENO was offered an inducement of £7.6 million to help in the transition of its business plan. In 2015 ENO was awarded National Portfolio Status judged against strict criteria, two of which were an effective business plan and sound governance. Shortly after passing these tests ENO was put into “special measures”. Darren Henley seems to think in this age of harsh austerity two opera houses cheek by jowl in London is fine; this all demonstrates that it is the Arts Council that lacks credible ideas. The Royal Opera House has absorbed vast amounts of lottery and revenue funding and is ripe for privatisation. It is time that the Arts Council is replaced with a leaner, innovative organisation that can deliver a policy for the arts that ensures equitable distribution of public funds across regions and art forms.
-
Recent Posts
- Submission to Ravinder Athwal – Director of Policy – Labour Party
- Soaring MDF prices, extortionate interval drinks, cash-strapped audiences: the arts are staring inflation in the face
- Brexit stage left: British band tells of farcical barriers encountered on EU tour
- Jacob Rees-Mogg MP and Brexit red tape
- Oliver Dowden – lay down smoke and show a clean pair of heels
-
Account